Title

Atapattu, S. (2013): Climate changes, indigenous peoples and the Arctic: The Changing Horizon of International Law. Journal of Michigan State International Law Review, 22 (1): 377-408.

Anderson, R. B., Dana, L. P. and Dana T.E. (2006): Indigenous land rights, entrepreneurship, and economic development in Canada: ‘‘Opting-in’’ to the global economy. Journal of World Business, 41: 45-55.

Baisheva, S. (2012): The main problems of the indigenous peoples of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) in terms of socio-cultural modernization: the Shear Zone // Russian Studies: Institute for Russian, East European and Eurasian Studies (IREEES) at Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea. pp. 343-386.

Baisheva, S. (2014): National daily life settlements Yakutia in the context of sociological research. Journal of Arctic and North, 14: 1-15. (In Russian).

Clark, R., Ott, A. and Rabe, M. (2010): The affects of the changing climate on key habits in Alaska. - Special Issue 10-14. - Alaska Department of Fish and Game.

Fjellheim, R. S., Henriksen, J. B. (2006): Oil and gas exploitation on Arctic indigenous peoples’ territories human rights, International law and corporate social responsibility. Aboriginal Policy Research Consortium International (APRCi). Paper 193. http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/aprci/193.

Gassiy, V. V. (2014): Regional aspects of the formation mechanisms of social responsibility. - Moscow: Economics. - 179 p. (In Russian).

Klokov, K. B. (2015): Methodological principles of ethnic minority life conditions assessment. Romanian Journal for Multidimensional Education (Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala), 7 (1): 105-116.

Koivurova, T., Oddsdottir, E. E., Yang, H., Yang, J. and Zhang, X. (2016): Foreword for Special Issue: Arctic policy and sustainable development. Advances in Polar Science, 27 (3).

Novikova, N. I. (2016): Who is responsible for the Russian Arctic? Co-operation between indigenous peoples and industrial companies in the context of legal pluralism. Energy Research and Social Science, 16: 98-110.

Novoselov, A., Potravnii, I., Novoselova, I. and Gassiy, V. (2016): Conflicts management in natural resources use and environment protection on the regional level. Journal of Environ-mental Management and Tourism, ASERS Publishing. 3(15): 407-415.

Potravny, I. M., Gassiy, V. V., Chernogradskiy, V. N. and Postnikov, A. V. (2016a): Corporate social responsibility in the territories of traditional land use as the basis of the partnership between government, business and indigenous peoples. Arctic: Ecology and Economy, 2: 56-63. (In Russian).

Potravny, I. M., Gassiy, V. V. and Tambovceva, Т. (2016b): Ethnological examination as a tool for coordination of interests of target groups in the field of traditional nature use. Environmental economics, 3: 80-92. (In Russian).

Potravny, I., Gassiy, V. and Umnov, V. (2016c): Social and Environmental Factors of Project Justification for Arctic Development: Procedures and Methods of Accounting. 3^rd International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts. SGEM 2016. Political Sciences, Finance, Economics and Tourism. Conference Proceedings. Volume IV. Economics and Tourism. Sofia, Bulgaria, pp. 581-585.

Web sources / Other sources

[1] Principles of State Policy of the Russian Federation in the Arctic for the period till 2020 and beyond. Approved by the President of the Russian Federation of September 18, 2008 // Russian newspaper Metropolitan Edition, 2009, March 27 http://www.rg.ru/2009/03/30/arktika-osnovy-dok.html.

[2] Partnership agreement on economic and community development in Nunavik [Text] Arctic science and technology informational system (ASTIS) (available at http://www.aina.ucalgary. ca/scripts/mwimain.dll/122/6/61.

[3] Order N565 of the Ministry of Regional Development of the Russian Federation of 9.12.2009 “Methodology for calculating the damage to indigenous peoples”. Electronic Fund of Law and Technical documentation of Russian Federation (available at http://docs.cntd.ru/document/ 902193558).

Title:	The assessment of the socio-economic damage of the indigenous peoples due to industrial development of Russian Arctic
Authors Name:	Violetta Gassiy, Ivan Potravny
Journal:	Czech Polar Reports
Issue:	7
Volume:	2
Page Range:	257-270
No. of Pages:	14
Year:	2017
DOI:	10.5817/CPR2017-2-25
Publishers:	muniPress Masaryk University Brno
ISSN:	1805-0689 (Print), 1805-0697 (On-line)
Language:	English
Subject:
Abstract:	The paper discusses the problem of the damage assessing to indigenous peoples in modern Russia in the context of industrial development in Arctic. Today the important question is the correlation of the indigenous inhabitants’ interests of the Arctic territories (the preservation of culture, traditional nature, etc.) with the objectives of companies-subsoil users. Therefore, the business’ and the indigenous peoples’ of the North cooperation mechanisms are currently researched and implemented in the industrial development of the territory, both at the primary stage of discussion, coordination of projects, and during investment project realization. The results of the social survey of the indigenous peoples made by the authors in Arctic areas are performed and analyzed in the paper. The research aims to improve the damage assessment methodology used in Russia.
Keywords:	Arctic, industrial development, indigenous peoples, damage assessment, Republic of Sakha (Yakutia)
References:	Atapattu, S. (2013): Climate changes, indigenous peoples and the Arctic: The Changing Horizon of International Law. Journal of Michigan State International Law Review, 22 (1): 377-408. Anderson, R. B., Dana, L. P. and Dana T.E. (2006): Indigenous land rights, entrepreneurship, and economic development in Canada: ‘‘Opting-in’’ to the global economy. Journal of World Business, 41: 45-55. Baisheva, S. (2012): The main problems of the indigenous peoples of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) in terms of socio-cultural modernization: the Shear Zone // Russian Studies: Institute for Russian, East European and Eurasian Studies (IREEES) at Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea. pp. 343-386. Baisheva, S. (2014): National daily life settlements Yakutia in the context of sociological research. Journal of Arctic and North, 14: 1-15. (In Russian). Clark, R., Ott, A. and Rabe, M. (2010): The affects of the changing climate on key habits in Alaska. - Special Issue 10-14. - Alaska Department of Fish and Game. Fjellheim, R. S., Henriksen, J. B. (2006): Oil and gas exploitation on Arctic indigenous peoples’ territories human rights, International law and corporate social responsibility. Aboriginal Policy Research Consortium International (APRCi). Paper 193. http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/aprci/193. Gassiy, V. V. (2014): Regional aspects of the formation mechanisms of social responsibility. - Moscow: Economics. - 179 p. (In Russian). Klokov, K. B. (2015): Methodological principles of ethnic minority life conditions assessment. Romanian Journal for Multidimensional Education (Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala), 7 (1): 105-116. Koivurova, T., Oddsdottir, E. E., Yang, H., Yang, J. and Zhang, X. (2016): Foreword for Special Issue: Arctic policy and sustainable development. Advances in Polar Science, 27 (3). Novikova, N. I. (2016): Who is responsible for the Russian Arctic? Co-operation between indigenous peoples and industrial companies in the context of legal pluralism. Energy Research and Social Science, 16: 98-110. Novoselov, A., Potravnii, I., Novoselova, I. and Gassiy, V. (2016): Conflicts management in natural resources use and environment protection on the regional level. Journal of Environ-mental Management and Tourism, ASERS Publishing. 3(15): 407-415. Potravny, I. M., Gassiy, V. V., Chernogradskiy, V. N. and Postnikov, A. V. (2016a): Corporate social responsibility in the territories of traditional land use as the basis of the partnership between government, business and indigenous peoples. Arctic: Ecology and Economy, 2: 56-63. (In Russian). Potravny, I. M., Gassiy, V. V. and Tambovceva, Т. (2016b): Ethnological examination as a tool for coordination of interests of target groups in the field of traditional nature use. Environmental economics, 3: 80-92. (In Russian). Potravny, I., Gassiy, V. and Umnov, V. (2016c): Social and Environmental Factors of Project Justification for Arctic Development: Procedures and Methods of Accounting. 3^rd International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts. SGEM 2016. Political Sciences, Finance, Economics and Tourism. Conference Proceedings. Volume IV. Economics and Tourism. Sofia, Bulgaria, pp. 581-585. Web sources / Other sources [1] Principles of State Policy of the Russian Federation in the Arctic for the period till 2020 and beyond. Approved by the President of the Russian Federation of September 18, 2008 // Russian newspaper Metropolitan Edition, 2009, March 27 http://www.rg.ru/2009/03/30/arktika-osnovy-dok.html. [2] Partnership agreement on economic and community development in Nunavik [Text] Arctic science and technology informational system (ASTIS) (available at http://www.aina.ucalgary. ca/scripts/mwimain.dll/122/6/61. [3] Order N565 of the Ministry of Regional Development of the Russian Federation of 9.12.2009 “Methodology for calculating the damage to indigenous peoples”. Electronic Fund of Law and Technical documentation of Russian Federation (available at http://docs.cntd.ru/document/ 902193558).
Notes:	ASSW