Title:

Comparative analysis of Russian and Norwegian precipitation gauges, measurements in Barentsburg, Western Spitsbergen

Authors Name:   

Aleksandra V. Urazgildeeva, Pavel N. Sviashchennikov, Boris V. Ivanov, Ketil Isaksen, Eirik J. Førland, Ragnar Brækkan

Journal: Czech Polar Reports
Issue: 7
Volume: 1
Page Range: 45-51
No. of Pages: 7
Year: 2017
DOI:

10.5817/CPR2017-1-5

Publishers: muniPress Masaryk University Brno
ISSN:    1805-0689 (Print), 1805-0697 (On-line)
Language: English
Subject:  
Abstract:

Comparative analysis of records of two gauges with different wind shields (Tretyakov gauge and Geonor T200-B) were done, based on time series of parallel measurement in Barentsburg settlement, Svalbard, during two winter times in period from September 2014 to July 2016. All collected data of solid precipitation were divided into two ranges with different wind speed conditions. As it was known from earlier papers, Tretyakov gauge measurements tend to underestimate solid precipitation in case when precipitation is not intensive and wind speed is less than 5 m s-1. Opposite results were obtained for blizzard conditions (wind speed is more than 6 m s-1): Tretyakov gauge shows greater values for amount of solid precipitation than Norwegian sensor. Preliminary results in Barentsburg cannot be described as conclusive ones. Estimation of solid precipitation on Spitsbergen measured by different gauges needs further and more detailed research, which includes fieldwork in Barentsburg in spring, such as detailed snow surveys in the settlement.
 

Keywords: Arctic, solid precipitation, Svalbard, bias-correction method
 

References:

Aleksandrоv, Е., Bryazgin, N., Forland, E., Radionov, V. and Svyashchennikov, P. (2005): Seasonal, interannual and long-term variability of precipitation and snow depth in the region of the Barents and Kara seas. Polar Research, 24(1-2): 69-85.

Bogdanova, E. G., Ilyin, B. M. and Dragomilova, I. V. (2002): Application of a comprehensive bias-correction model to precipitation measured at Russian North Pole Drifting Stations. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 3: 700-713.

Bryazgin, N. N. (1976): Mean precipitation amount in the Arctic including errors of gauges. Transactions of AARI, 323: 40-74. (In Russian).

Førland, E. J., Allerup, P., Dahlstrom, B., Elomaa, F., Jonsson, T., Madsen, H., Perala, J., Rissanen, P., Vedin, H. and Vejen, F. (1996): Manual for operational correction of Nordic precipitation data. Norwegian Meteorological Institute Report, 24/96 KLIMA, p. 66.

Førland, E. J., Hanssen-Bauer, I. (2000): Increased precipitation in Norwegian Arctic: True or false? Climatic Change, 46: 485-509.

Gilbert, R. O. (1987): Statistical methods for environmental pollution monitoring. Willey, 336 p.

Goldfeld, S. M., Quandt, R. E. (1965): Some tests for homoscedasticity. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 60 (310): 539-547.

Golubev, V. S., Simonenko, A. Y. (1998): Comparison of precipitation measurements by standard gauges of different countries at the Precipitation Polygon in Valdai. Annex 5 Country Reports, Contribution of the Russian Federation to the WMO Solid Precipitation Measurement Intercomparison Final Report WMO/TD-872, 164-200.

Hanssen-Bauer, I., Førland, E. J. and Nordli, P. O. (1996): Measured and true precipitation at Svalbard. Norwegian Meteorological Institute Report, 31/96 KLIMA, p. 49.

Mann, H. B. (1945): Non-parametric tests against trend. Econometrica, 13: 163-171.

Kendall, M. G. (1975): Rank Correlation Methods, 4th edition, Charles Griffin, London, 272 p.

Sviashchennikov, P., Ivanov, B., Kashin, S. and Grablenko, A. (2007): Snow surveys measurements in the vicinity of Barentsburg research station. Russian Information Bulletin “International Polar Year 2007-2008 news”, №5-6, p. 8-9.

Walsh, J. E., Kattsov, V., Portis, D. and Meleshko, V. (1998): Arctic precipitation and evaporation: Model results and observational estimates. Journal of Climate, 11: 72-87.

Wolff, M. A., Isaksen, K., Petersen-Øverleir, A,. Ødemark, K., Reitan, T. and Brækkan, R. (2015): Derivation of a new continuous adjustment function for correcting wind-induced loss of solid precipitation: results of a Norwegian field study. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 19: 951-967, doi:10.5194/hess-19-951-2015.

Yang, D., Goodison, B. E., Metcalfe, J. R., Golubev, V. S., Elomaa, E., Gunther, T., Bates, R., Pangburn, T., Hanson, C. L., Emerson, D., Copaciu, V. and Milkovic, J. (1995): Accuracy of Tretyakov precipitation gauge: Results of WMO Intercomparison. Hydrological Processes, 9: 877-895.

 

Web sources / Other sources

 

[1] NorACIA: Norwegian Arctic Climate Assessment. Brief Report Series no. 018, 2010.

[2] WMO (1998): Instrument and observing methods. WMO Solid Precipitation Measurement Intercomparison Final Rep. 67, WMO/TD-872, 212 p.

[3] Reliable prognosis weather (http://rp5.ru/)

[4] Norwegian Meteorological Institute for GEONOR T200-B records (http://eklima.met.no)

Notes: