Habilitation and Professor Appointment Procedure

Basic information

Approximate requirement criteria for applicants

Applicants demonstrate:

    • Pedagogical experience with leading semester-long courses
    • Experience with supervising bachelor’s, master’s, and doctoral students
    • International experience and impact independence in securing and implementation one's research activities
    • Overall publishing performance, high-quality scientific output, and international response
    • Major contribution to scientific publications

Meeting the field-specific indicators may not be interpreted as claimable. The board always individually assesses the comprehensive profile of the applicant. Higher values in individual indicators than those specified in the indicative table may be required depending on the particular sub-field. The board also individually assesses situations when the applicant displays lower values in certain indicators, which are, however, balanced out by a better profile in other parameters.

Before preparation of the procedure initiation proposal, a consultation with the Vice-Dean for Research and Development is recommended.


Expected pedagogical and professional experience

Habilitation procedure

  • More than 5 years of active pedagogical practice at higher education institutions
  • Teaching a semester-long course (at least a seminar, tutorial, etc.)
  • Independent grant activity with the potential to obtain extramural research funding
  • Supervision of successfully defended bachelor’s and master’s theses (the expected numbers vary by field and are assessed by the habilitation board)
  • Significant international experience, usually an international postdoctoral stay

Professor appointment procedure

  • Usually 10 years of active pedagogical practice at higher education institutions
  • Guaranteeing and leading a lecture or other important semester-long course
  • Supervision of doctoral students and successfully defended doctoral theses (the expected numbers vary by field and are assessed by the evaluation board)
  • Leading a research or grant group, independent grant activity
  • Significant and independent international experience

Expected field-specific requirements for research activity

Table – indicative requirements (1st number – habilitation procedure / 2nd number – professor appointment procedure). Please note that higher indicators may be expected at individual sub-areas.

 

High-quality research outcomes with a major contribution of the applicant (i.e. typically main or corresponding author*)

Original publications (regular articles) in WoS

International peer-review publications (in total)

Citations (without self-citations) in WoS**

Geography, Geology, Anthropology

2 / 6

6 / 15

20 / 40

15 / 30

Biology, Chemistry, Biochemistry, Life Sciences, Environmental Health Science

5 / 20

15 / 40

n/a

100 / 200

Mathematics

2 / 6

6 / 15

15 / 30

10 / 30

Physics

5 / 10

15 / 40

n/a

60 / 200

*original publications in journals above the median of the field according to WoS, monographs
**other citations may exceptionally be accepted for specific sub-areas

How to submit an application

  1. Before submitting the application, the applicant consults his intention with the head of his department.
  2. It is assumed that at this point the applicant has already written a habilitation thesis according to the conditions specified in Section 5 of the Directive.
  3. Then the applicant fills in the faculty annex, and all annexes according to the MU Directive No. 7/2017.
    • In the event that the applicant has a larger publishing, and citation activity, he may ask the assistant to provide a citation analysis that will replace part A of Annex No. 6. The analysis is processed by the Centre for Scientometric Support and Evaluation
    • Please do not modify the attachment forms in any way when filling them out. If you have nothing to fill in, leave the box blank.
    • In case of any questions, the applicant can contact the assistant.
  4. The applicant sends the completed attachments by e-mail to the assistant in Word, and also attaches the habilitation thesis, three significant publications and university diplomas. In the case of an appointment procedure the applicant replaces the thesis with two letters of recommendation.
  5. The assistant will check the annexes, and will put them in a formally correct form together with the applicant.
  6. Once the annexes are in order, the applicant will print them, sign them, and send scans to the assistant by e-mail.
    • Annexes must be structured in individual files: one attachment = one file.
    • Please name the forms "Surname_Annex 1" etc.
  7. Subsequently, the applicant personally delivers all the documents listed below to the department.

FACULTY ANNEX ANNEXES BY DIRECTIVE


What to pay attention to when filling out the annexes:

  • Fill in all annexes exclusively in English.
  • Sort records (employment, study, publications) chronologically from newest to oldest.
  • Each entry (publication, article) must always be listed only once – if it falls into more than one category or annex, select only one.
  • List all authors in bibliographic records (do not use the abbreviation "et al.") and always state the title of the article.

Annex No. 1 or 2:

Annex No. 4 a 5:

  • List all publications and citation records that are relevant to the field.
  • It is not possible to present scientific and pedagogical results that have not yet been published! These can be listed only in Annex No. 7.
  • The bibliographic record must be in the language in which the publication was published.
  • In Annex No. 5, it is mandatory to state the quartile according to AIS / SJR for records where it is possible.
  • In the category Other works considered important by the applicant, you can list, for example, works that have not yet been published (e.g., postprints).

Annex No. 6:

  • It is possible to state self-citations (citations by the applicant himself). In that case, it is necessary to state this fact at the beginning of Annex No. 6, and at the same time to record the share of self-citations in Annex No. 7.
  • List each citation only once. It's all right to list the same citation several times only if it applies to different results, and it means that the author of the citation cited several different results of yours in his one work.

Annex No. 7:

  • If you don't have a citation analysis: the field Citations – international databases contains the sum of citations from WoS and Scopus databases. Other citations are listed in Citations – other.
  • If you do have a citation analysis: enter the number taken from section 3. Citation Impact – Web of Science in the Summary Metrics table. You can select the data from either the Web of Science or Scopus. You can enter the number of citations with self-citations, but then you need to fill in the share of self-citations. If you do not want to list self-citations, enter the number of citations without self-citations and leave the share of self-citations blank. Citations from databases other than WoS and Scopus are listed in Citations – other.
  • In the Additional comments on publication activities section, it is possible to insert, for example, work-in-progress publications (which are in print or review proceedings) or anything that has not yet been mentioned in other annexes.

The applicant will bring to the department:

1) In the case of a habilitation procedure

  • Originals of all annexes + certified copies of materials documenting the completion of higher education and obtained academic degrees in ring (or other) binding
    • Materials documenting the completion of higher education and obtained academic degrees mean: university diploma and relevant annexes (final state examination certificate, diploma supplement, etc.).
    • A certified copy may constitute either a notarized copy or a copy certified by a registry office or a statement issued by an authorized employee of the Dean's Office, attesting to the fact that the copy corresponds to the original document and confirmed by his/her signature and stamp.
    • Therefore, if you do not have certified copies of the diplomas, just include a copy in the file and bring the original diplomas with you to the department – the clerk will compare the copies to the originals, which will then be stamped and signed.
    • Sort materials according to the guidelines of the directive: Annex 2, recommendation letters, Annex 3, diplomas, Annexes 4-9.
    • Print the documents on both sides, connect them with a stapler and place them in a folder, preferably with a hard binding (ring binding, quick binder, etc.).
  • (Habilitation thesis)
    • The habilitation thesis is primarily submitted in electronic form. The possible number of printed copies is later determined by the habilitation board according to its needs, resp. according to the requirements of opponents. If the electronic version of the thesis is sufficient for the assessment, it is not necessary to submit the habilitation thesis in printed form.
    • ATTENTION! There are several types of habilitation thesis. Article 6 of Directive No 7 sets out the requirements for each type of thesis. We list the essentials of the most common type of thesis:

Habilitation thesis type B contains the so-called commentary:

  • The commentary (similar to abstract) should briefly introduce what the applicant dealt with in the habilitation thesis, what are its main goals and results, what methods the applicant used, etc.
  • It is very important for the individual studies that are part of the habilitation thesis to state the quantitative and content authorial share of the applicant.
  • You can look at one of the applicant's commentaries published on the page of his qualification procedure.
  • It is in English and can be brief (approx. 1–2 pages).
  • You can download an example of a possible commentary structure here.

2) In the case of a professor appointment procedure

    • Originals of annexes + certified copies of university diplomas and relevant annexes + letters of recommendation
      • Relevant annexes such as final state examination certificate, diploma supplement, etc.
      • A certified copy may constitute either a notarized copy or a copy certified by a registry office or a statement issued by an authorized employee of the Dean's Office, attesting to the fact that the copy corresponds to the original document and confirmed by his/her signature and stamp.
      • Therefore, if you do not have certified copies of the diplomas, just include a copy in the file and bring the original diplomas with you to the department – the assistant will compare the copies to the originals, which will then be stamped and signed.
      • Letters of recommendation mean two letters from professors in identical or similar fields. In case these letters are written in a language other than English, the applicant shall also provide a notarized translation into English.
      • Sort materials according to the guidelines of the directive: Annex 2, recommendation letters, Annex 3, diplomas, Annexes 4-9.
      • Print the documents on both sides, connect them with a stapler and place them in a folder, preferably with a hard binding (ring binding, quick binder, etc.).
    • Two copies of Annex No. 3, and one copy of Annexes No. 4, 5, and 9 (insert into a separate folder)
      • (Three publications considered by the applicant to be the most significant) - just send by e-mail in PDF; at the end of the professorship procedure you will need to print these publications for the Scientific Board of the Masaryk University

Applicants submit all materials in person to the Office for Doctoral Studies, Quality, Academic Affairs, and Internationalization to the hands of the assistant Bc. Jana Procházková.


If the applicant has completed a doctoral degree abroad:

  • It is necessary to nostrify (recognize) this education at the Research & Development Office of the MU Rector's Office.
  • Recognition of education obtained in countries with bilateral agreements (Hungary, Germany, Poland, and Slovenia) has its own conditions.
  • All information on how to nostrify your foreign education can be found here.
  • Please attach the certificate of recognition of equivalent foreign education to the copies of diplomas in both files (original and copy). Then bring the original of this document with you to the department, against which the copies in the files will be compared and certified.

Updating the annexes:

The applicant may update documents in accordance with subsection 2 (with the exception of public lecture proposals) at any time during the procedure, but always in such a manner so that such documents are made available to all other parties participating in the procedure (i.e. habilitation board and scientific board members) no later than 5 workdays prior to their evaluation. Each updated document must include the current date and the applicant's signature; an electronic version, i.e. scan of the signed document must also be submitted.

Information on the process of the procedures

Public lecture

The public lecture takes place after the habilitation/evaluation board (and the opponents) was appointed. However, its date has nothing to do with the work of the opponents, it can take place in parallel. The topic of the public lecture will be selected by the board from the three proposals of the applicant listed in Annex 1. All communication regarding this event is agreed upon between the applicant and the chairman of the board.

Information about the lecture is usually published on the institute's website so that interested members of the public can attend. The lecture must be attended by at least 3 members of the board so that it can be evaluated in writing. It is always necessary to create an attendance list of all present listeners from the event.

At this time, when the possibility of full-time participation of a larger number of participants in public lectures is limited, we recommend proceeding as follows:

1) Online public lecture – preferred option
The lecture takes place online via MS Teams, Zoom or another tool. The link to the online public lecture is usually published by the chairman on the institute's website, further at its discretion.
The formal requirements include finding out the number of participants in the lecture. The lecture is attended by at least 3 members of the board.
After the lecture is finished, the chairman fills in Annex No. 11 – Public Lecture Evaluation, stating in what form the lecture was realized and also the fact that it was attended by another min. 2 members of the board who agree with its evaluation. The annex is signed only by the chairman.

2) Hybrid public lecture
The lecture is attended by a maximum of 10 people (including the applicant) in a sufficiently large room, and at the same time, an online transmission via MS Teams, Zoom, or another tool is provided. The link to the online public lecture is usually published by the chairman of the board on the institute's website, further at its discretion. The applicant does not have to wear a face mask during the presentation, the others in the room do have to wear it.
The formal requirements include finding out the number of participants in the lecture. At least 3 members of the board attend the lecture in person or online.
After the lecture is finished, the chairman fills in Annex No. 11 – Public Lecture Evaluation, stating in what form the lecture was realized and also the fact that it was attended by another min. 2 members of the board who agree with its evaluation. The annex is signed only by the chairman.

Public Lecture Evaluation form


Scientific Board of the Faculty of Science

Once all the necessary steps have been taken in the given procedure, it is possible to forward the application to the Scientific Board of the faculty. The meeting shall be attended by the applicant, members of the Scientific Board, the Chairman of the Board, and eventually the public (guests).

The procedure is initiated by the chairman, who briefly introduces the candidate and provides summary information on the board's vote. This is followed by a lecture provided by the applicant, which lasts 15 minutes and during which the applicant should prove his scientific and pedagogical competence in the field.

After the lecture, in the case of the habilitation procedure, the chairman comments on the opponents' opinions and selects 2 questions from their reviews, to which the applicant responds. Following is a discussion in which the members of the Scientific Board ask questions to the applicant.

After a public debate, there is a non-public discussion (between SB members) which ends with a secret ballot. The Dean announces the result of the vote to the applicant – the proposal is either forwarded, or the procedure is terminated.

Habilitation procedures
Name MU Faculty field of study Started
RNDr. Mgr. Jozef Hritz, Ph.D. Faculty of Science Physical Chemistry 15 Jun 2021
Mgr. Peter Šepitka, Ph.D. Faculty of Science Mathematics - Mathematical Analysis 1 Jun 2021
Mgr. Zuzana Pátíková, Ph.D. Faculty of Science Mathematics - Mathematical Analysis 27 May 2021
Phuoc Tai Nguyen Faculty of Science Mathematics - Mathematical Analysis 15 Dec 2020
Fields of study of habilitation procedure
field of study MU Faculty Accreditation expiry date
Analytical Chemistry Faculty of Science 11/30/2023
Animal Physiology Faculty of Science 11/30/2023
Anthropology Faculty of Science 10/13/2030
Biochemistry Faculty of Science 11/30/2023
Biomolecular Chemistry Faculty of Science 11/30/2023
Botany Faculty of Science 5/3/2028
Cartography, Geoinformatics and Remote Sensing Faculty of Science 10/15/2029
Condensed Matter Physics Faculty of Science 11/30/2023
Ecology Faculty of Science 11/30/2023
Ecotoxicology Faculty of Science 11/30/2023
Environmental Health Sciences Faculty of Science 6/24/2031
Environmental Chemistry Faculty of Science 11/30/2023
Genomics and Proteomics Faculty of Science 9/1/2030
Geology Faculty of Science 5/3/2028
Inorganic Chemistry Faculty of Science 10/15/2029
Mathematics - Algebra and Theory of Numbers Faculty of Science 11/30/2023
Mathematics - Applied Mathematics Faculty of Science 11/30/2023
Mathematics - Geometry Faculty of Science 11/30/2023
Mathematics - Mathematical Analysis Faculty of Science 11/30/2023
Microbiology Faculty of Science 9/17/2029
Molecular Biology and Genetics Faculty of Science 11/30/2023
Organic Chemistry Faculty of Science 11/30/2023
Physical Geography Faculty of Science 11/30/2023
Physical Chemistry Faculty of Science 11/30/2023
Physics of Plasma Faculty of Science 11/30/2023
Plant Physiology Faculty of Science 11/30/2023
Social geography and regional development Faculty of Science 1/7/2030
Theoretical Physics and Astrophysics Faculty of Science 11/27/2029
Zoology Faculty of Science 11/30/2023
Professorship procedures
Name MU Faculty field of study Started
doc. Mgr. Norbert Werner, Ph.D. Faculty of Science Theoretical Physics and Astrophysics 14 Jul 2021
doc. Mgr. Václav Brázda, Ph.D. Faculty of Science Molecular Biology and Genetics 29 Jun 2021
doc. RNDr. Roman Pantůček, Ph.D. Faculty of Science Molecular Biology and Genetics 11 Mar 2021
doc. RNDr. Petr Kubíček, CSc. Faculty of Science Cartography, Geoinformatics and Remote Sensing 2 Dec 2020
Fields of study of professorship procedure
field of study MU Faculty Accreditation expiry date
Analytical Chemistry Faculty of Science 11/30/2023
Animal Physiology Faculty of Science 11/30/2023
Anthropology Faculty of Science 10/13/2030
Biochemistry Faculty of Science 11/30/2023
Biomolecular Chemistry Faculty of Science 11/30/2023
Botany Faculty of Science 5/3/2028
Cartography, Geoinformatics and Remote Sensing Faculty of Science 10/15/2029
Condensed Matter Physics Faculty of Science 11/30/2023
Ecology Faculty of Science 11/30/2023
Ecotoxicology Faculty of Science 11/30/2023
Environmental Health Sciences Faculty of Science 6/24/2031
Environmental Chemistry Faculty of Science 11/30/2023
Genomics and Proteomics Faculty of Science 9/1/2030
Geology Faculty of Science 5/3/2028
Inorganic Chemistry Faculty of Science 10/15/2029
Mathematics - Algebra and Theory of Numbers Faculty of Science 11/30/2023
Mathematics - Geometry Faculty of Science 11/30/2023
Mathematics - Mathematical Analysis Faculty of Science 11/30/2023
Microbiology Faculty of Science 9/17/2029
Molecular Biology and Genetics Faculty of Science 11/30/2023
Organic Chemistry Faculty of Science 11/30/2023
Physical Geography Faculty of Science 11/30/2023
Physical Chemistry Faculty of Science 11/30/2023
Physics of Plasma Faculty of Science 11/30/2023
Plant Physiology Faculty of Science 11/30/2023
Theoretical Physics and Astrophysics Faculty of Science 11/27/2029
Zoology Faculty of Science 11/30/2023
Adjunct professor

Adjunct professor

Act No. 111/1998 Coll., on higher education as amended (the Higher Education Act), establishes that an institute of higher education that has acquired institutional accreditation in a certain area of instruction can establish the position of adjunct professor. Masaryk University acquired institutional accreditation in May 2018 for a period of ten years in 23 areas of instruction. A list is available here (in Czech).

According to the Higher Education Act, holding the position of an adjunct professor is in many respects comparable to possessing the title of associate professor or professor. There are, however, some limitations associated with this position, which are outlined here (in Czech). A person can be hired as an adjunct professor only if they have reached a status equivalent to associate professor or professor outside of the Czech Republic, or if they are a prominent expert who has at least 20 years of experience teaching in a higher education setting.

The process and rules for hiring an adjunct professor are described in Regulations on Competitive Selection Procedures at Masaryk University.


The procedure for hiring an adjunct professor

The proposal of the head of the department for filling the position of an adjunct professor is first submitted with a brief justification to the head of the Personnel Office of the Faculty of Science, Mgr. Jana Kneblová.

After approval at this level, the proposal is included in the program of the Scientific Board of the Faculty of Science. Only after the approval by the scientific board of the faculty it is possible to submit the proposal with all appendices to the rector through the Doctoral Studies and Science Qualification Division, to Mgr. Zdenka Loučková.

Annexes to the proposal:

  • the applicant’s CV;
  • documents confirming compliance with legal requirements;
  • the minutes from the meeting of the board responsible for the selection process (if such a meeting was held) or a description and justification of why the position is being filled in this manner;
  • the minutes from the meeting of the Scientific Board of the Faculty of Science; and
  • other documents deemed necessary by the head of the department in question.

To submit a proposal, please use the form found here (in Czech).

Ing. Lucie Janíčková

Division head, Office for Doctoral Studies, Quality, Academic Affairs and Internationalization

Phone: +420 549 49 1406
E‑mail:
Bc. Jana Procházková

Assistant for Quality and Academic Affairs

Phone: +420 549 49 5929
E‑mail:

You are running an old browser version. We recommend updating your browser to its latest version.